Predicting the Mechanical Behavior of Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites Through Data-Driven Multiscale Modeling
Keywords:
fiber-reinforced polymer composites; multiscale modeling; data-driven surrogate; computational homogenization; uncertainty quantification; physics-informed learningAbstract
Fiber-reinforced polymer composites exhibit mechanical behavior that emerges from coupled mechanisms across fiber, matrix, interface, and laminate scales. Computational homogenization can represent these mechanisms, but repeated fine-scale simulations are too expensive for design exploration, inverse identification, and uncertainty propagation. This manuscript develops a data-driven multiscale modeling framework for predicting effective elastic and failure-relevant response of fiber-reinforced polymer composites with quantified uncertainty. The framework combines representative volume element analyses, microstructure descriptors that encode fiber volume fraction, orientation, aspect ratio, spatial clustering, and interface-sensitive quantities, and a physics-constrained surrogate that maps descriptors to homogenized properties. A Gaussian-process component supplies nonparametric regression and predictive variance, while a physics-informed residual term enforces equilibrium-consistent trends and monotonic constraints derived from micromechanics. Multifidelity correction links inexpensive lower-fidelity estimates to higher-fidelity homogenization data, and Bayesian calibration treats uncertain model parameters and manufacturing-induced variability explicitly. The central contribution is an integrated formulation that connects microstructural descriptors, surrogate inference, physics constraints, multifidelity correction, and uncertainty propagation in one predictive chain. The analysis clarifies where data-driven acceleration is defensible, how descriptor choice affects extrapolation, and why calibration must separate parameter uncertainty from model discrepancy. The resulting framework provides a technically grounded route for predicting composite mechanical behavior without treating machine learning as a black-box substitute for mechanics.
References
1. Hashin, Z. (1983). Analysis of composite materials—A survey. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 50(3), 481–505.
2. Nemat-Nasser, S., & Hori, M. (1999). Micromechanics: Overall properties of heterogeneous materials (2nd ed.). Elsevier.
3. Fish, J. (2013). Practical multiscaling. Wiley.
4. Oden, J. T., Prudhomme, S., Romkes, A., & Bauman, P. T. (2006). Multiscale modeling of physical phenomena: Adaptive control of models. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 28(6), 2359–2389.
5. Geers, M. G. D., Kouznetsova, V. G., & Brekelmans, W. A. M. (2010). Multi-scale computational homogenization: Trends and challenges. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 234(7), 2175–2182.
6. Matouš, K., Geers, M. G. D., Kouznetsova, V. G., Gillman, A., & Chatzigeorgiou, G. (2017). A review of predictive nonlinear theories for multiscale modeling of heterogeneous materials. Journal of Computational Physics, 330, 192–220.
7. Bessa, M. A., Bostanabad, R., Liu, Z., Hu, W., Apley, D. W., Brinson, C., Chen, W., & Liu, W. K. (2017). A framework for data-driven analysis of materials under uncertainty: Countering the curse of dimensionality. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 320, 633–667.
8. Liu, Z., Bessa, M. A., & Liu, W. K. (2016). Self-consistent clustering analysis: An efficient multi-scale scheme for inelastic heterogeneous materials. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 306, 319–341.
9. Oskay, C., & Fish, J. (2007). Eigendeformation-based reduced order homogenization for failure analysis of heterogeneous materials. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 196(7), 1216–1243.
10. Feyel, F., & Chaboche, J. L. (2000). FE2 multiscale approach for modelling the elastoviscoplastic behaviour of long fibre SiC/Ti composite materials. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 183(3–4), 309–330.
11. Bostanabad, R., Zhang, Y., Li, X., Kearney, T., Brinson, L. C., Apley, D. W., Liu, W. K., & Chen, W. (2018). Computational microstructure characterization and reconstruction: Review of the state-of-the-art techniques. Progress in Materials Science, 95, 1–41.
12. Torquato, S. (2002). Random heterogeneous materials: Microstructure and macroscopic properties. Springer.
13. Rasmussen, C. E., & Williams, C. K. I. (2006). Gaussian processes for machine learning. MIT Press.
14. Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2019). Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. Journal of Computational Physics, 378, 686–707.
15. Karpatne, A., Atluri, G., Faghmous, J. H., Steinbach, M., Banerjee, A., Ganguly, A., Shekhar, S., Samatova, N., & Kumar, V. (2017). Theory-guided data science: A new paradigm for scientific discovery from data. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 29(10), 2318–2331.
16. Ou, Y., Bao, D. W., Zhu, G. Q., & Luo, D. (2022). Additive fabrication of large-scale customizable formwork using robotic fiber-reinforced polymer winding. 3D printing and additive manufacturing, 9(2), 109-121.
17. Peherstorfer, B., Willcox, K., & Gunzburger, M. (2018). Survey of multifidelity methods in uncertainty propagation, inference, and optimization. SIAM Review, 60(3), 550–591.
18. Kennedy, M. C., & O'Hagan, A. (2001). Bayesian calibration of computer models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 63(3), 425–464.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Computational Intelligence Systems

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.