Federated Learning-Based Anomaly Detection for Secure and Reliable Optical Data Center Infrastructure

Authors

  • Job Jonkman Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA. Author
  • Jakub Iciek Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV, USA. Author
  • Patrizio Bembo Department of Computer Science, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA. Author

Keywords:

federated learning; anomaly detection; optical data centers; secure aggregation; optical performance monitoring; data center reliability; artificial intelligence governance; sustainability

Abstract

Optical data center infrastructure is becoming increasingly central to cloud computing, artificial intelligence training, high-performance computing, and latency-sensitive digital services. As data centers scale in port count, wavelength density, switching complexity, and geographic distribution, the task of detecting anomalies that threaten reliability and security becomes more difficult. Centralized anomaly detection architectures struggle with data movement costs, privacy constraints, multi-tenant governance, and the need for low-latency responses across heterogeneous optical domains. This paper examines federated learning as a system-level approach for anomaly detection in optical data center infrastructure. It analyzes how decentralized model training can support secure and reliable operations across racks, pods, fabrics, and interconnected facilities while respecting domain boundaries and reducing raw telemetry centralization. The discussion focuses on architectural trade-offs, including communication overhead, non-identically distributed telemetry, secure aggregation, model provenance, fault isolation, and explainability. It also considers the physical-layer realities of optical networks, including wavelength switching, clock synchronization, hollow-core fiber, optical performance monitoring, and programmable photonic components, all of which shape the anomaly baselines that learning systems must interpret. The paper further evaluates governance, fairness, sustainability, and policy implications, arguing that federated anomaly detection should be understood not merely as a machine learning deployment pattern but as a socio-technical control mechanism for critical infrastructure. It concludes that reliable optical data centers require hybrid architectures that combine local autonomy, hierarchical coordination, cryptographic trust, and human oversight, while avoiding excessive centralization or unmanaged federation.

References

1. McMahan, H. B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S., & Arcas, B. A. (2017). Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, 1273-1282.

2. Kairouz, P., McMahan, H. B., Avent, B., Bellet, A., Bennis, M., Bhagoji, A. N., ... Zhao, S. (2021). Advances and open problems in federated learning. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, 14(1-2), 1-210.

3. Li, T., Sahu, A. K., Talwalkar, A., & Smith, V. (2020). Federated learning: Challenges, methods, and future directions. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 37(3), 50-60.

4. Bonawitz, K., Ivanov, V., Kreuter, B., Marcedone, A., McMahan, H. B., Patel, S., ... Seth, K. (2017). Practical secure aggregation for privacy-preserving machine learning. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 1175-1191.

5. Zhao, Y., Li, M., Lai, L., Suda, N., Civin, D., & Chandra, V. (2018). Federated learning with non-IID data. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.00582.

6. Chandola, V., Banerjee, A., & Kumar, V. (2009). Anomaly detection: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 41(3), 1-58.

7. Pang, G., Shen, C., Cao, L., & van den Hengel, A. (2021). Deep learning for anomaly detection: A review. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(2), 1-38.

8. Ruff, L., Kauffmann, J. R., Vandermeulen, R. A., Montavon, G., Samek, W., Kloft, M., ... Müller, K. R. (2021). A unifying review of deep and shallow anomaly detection. Proceedings of the IEEE, 109(5), 756-795.

9. Ahmed, M., Mahmood, A. N., & Hu, J. (2016). A survey of network anomaly detection techniques. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 60, 19-31.

10. Kachris, C., & Tomkos, I. (2012). A survey on optical interconnects for data centers. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 14(4), 1021-1036.

11. Musumeci, F., Rottondi, C., Nag, A., Macaluso, I., Zibar, D., Ruffini, M., & Tornatore, M. (2019). An overview on application of machine learning techniques in optical networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 21(2), 1383-1408.

12. Masanet, E., Shehabi, A., Lei, N., Smith, S., & Koomey, J. (2020). Recalibrating global data center energy-use estimates. Science, 367(6481), 984-986.

13. Jones, N. (2018). How to stop data centres from gobbling up the world's electricity. Nature, 561(7722), 163-166.

14. Biggio, B., & Roli, F. (2018). Wild patterns: Ten years after the rise of adversarial machine learning. Pattern Recognition, 84, 317-331.

15. Papernot, N., McDaniel, P., Sinha, A., & Wellman, M. P. (2018). SoK: Security and privacy in machine learning. 2018 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy, 399-414.

16. Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., ... Vayena, E. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689-707.

17. Zhou, Zichuan, et al. "Low-latency wavelength-switched clock-synchronized intra-data center interconnects enabled by hollow core fiber." Optics Express 31.15 (2023): 24739-24748.

18. Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2021). A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(6), 1-35.

19. Goodfellow, I. J., Shlens, J., & Szegedy, C. (2015). Explaining and harnessing adversarial examples. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6572.

20. Cheng, Q., Bahadori, M., Glick, M., Rumley, S., & Bergman, K. (2018). Recent advances in optical technologies for data centers: A review. Optica, 5(11), 1354-1370.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-21